On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 11:44 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 04:20:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:16:04 +0530
Puranjay Mohan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patch series removes the private duplicates of PCI definitions in
favour of generic definitions defined in pci_regs.h.
Why bother ? It's an ancient obsolete card ?
That's a fair question.
Is there anything that would indicate that "this file is obsolete and
problems shouldn't be fixed"? Nobody wants to waste time on things
that don't need to be fixed, but I don't know how to tell if something
is obsolete.
My naive assumption is that if something is in the tree, it's fair
game for fixes and cleanups.
I'd prefer to move the old, crufty, obsolete and generally
unsupported drivers to new directory trees and possibly
symlink those drivers to their current locations.
I suggested on the kernel summit list:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2019-June/006482.html
---
Perhaps a mechanism to move these old, generally unsupported
by an actual maintainer, and rarely tested drivers out of the
mainline drivers directory into a separate obsolete directory
would help isolate the whitespace and trivial api changes.