Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/22] ethtool: support for netlink notifications
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2019-03-27 10:04:46
Also in:
lkml
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2019-03-27 10:04:46
Also in:
lkml
Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:51:48AM CET, andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:38:43AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:17:20PM CET, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:34:00PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:08:18PM CET, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:quoted
+void ethtool_notify(struct net_device *dev, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, + unsigned int cmd, u32 req_mask, const void *data) +{ + if (unlikely(!ethnl_ok))Why do you need this?If genetlink family registration fails, ethtool_notify() can be still called from other code (e.g. the ethtool ioctl interface). In such case, better bail out right away than fail somewhere later (probably after preparing the message which can't be sent anyway).Again, haven't seen this in any other gen netlink implementation. Why do they not need it?Hi Jiri All other gen netlink kill the machine dead if they cannot register
Wait, what do you mean be "kill the machine dead"?
the socket.
Example:
static int __init devlink_init(void)
{
return genl_register_family(&devlink_nl_family);
}