Re: [PATCH net-next v5 01/22] rtnetlink: provide permanent hardware address in RTM_NEWLINK
From: Michal Kubecek <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-26 10:31:24
Also in:
lkml
From: Michal Kubecek <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-26 10:31:24
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
I don't think we should put permaddr if driver did not set it. 2 solutions: 1) provide a helper that driver will use to set the perm_addr. This helper sets a "valid bit". Then you only put IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS in case the "valid bit" is set. 2) Assuming that no driver would set permaddr to all zeroes, don't put IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS in case permadd is all zeroes.
I already replied to similar suggestion in v4 discussion: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1060164/#2117512 But I don't have really strong opinion about this. The problem with not being able to distinguish between "no/unknown permanent address" and "old kernel not providing the information" is going to become less important over time. Michal