On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:42:26PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rajat Jain [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Marcel,

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Rajat,

quoted

In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split
usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and
usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <redacted>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai <redacted>
---
v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures.
v3: same as v1
v2: same as v1

drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree?

Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you
have any objections / suggestions?

That's up to Greg, but since he'd acked the patches I'd assume he's OK
with taking it through bluetooth. As an option Marcel could cut an
immutable branch off 4.20 with the first 2 patches so that he and Greg
can both pull it into their main branches and then git will do the
right thing when Linus pulls from them. Lee uses quite a bit of them
in MFD and other maintainers are known to occasionally make them for
work that needs to be shared between trees.

I don't need to take these, they can all go through one tree, which is
why I gave my ack to the patch.

thanks,

greg k-h