On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:44 PM Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Also for more context, see:
commit 7829fb09a2b4 ("lib: make memzero_explicit more robust against
dead store elimination")
By the way, shouldn't that barrier_data() be directly in compiler.h
too, since it is for both gcc & clang?
quoted
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
+ Miguel
Miguel, would you mind taking this into your compiler-attributes tree?
Sure, at least we get quickly some linux-next time.
BTW why linux-next? shouldn't this go into 5.0 and stable? It's a bugfix after all.
Note it would be nice to separate the patch into two (one for the
comments, another for OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR), and also possibly another
for barrier_data().
Cheers,
Miguel