Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] barriers using data dependency
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2019-01-02 21:36:43
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So as explained in Documentation/memory-barriers.txt e.g. a load followed by a store require a full memory barrier, to avoid store being ordered before the load. Similarly load-load requires a read memory barrier. Thinking about it, we can actually create a data dependency by mixing the first loaded value into the pointer being accessed. This adds an API for this and uses it in virtio. Written over the holiday and build tested only so far.
You are using the terminology from memory-barriers.txt, referring to the new dependency you create as a data dependency. However, tools/memory-model/* uses a more precise name, calling it an address dependency. Could you change the comments in the patches to use this name instead?
This patchset is also suboptimal on e.g. x86 where e.g. smp_rmb is a nop.
This should be easy to fix with an architecture-specific override. Alan Stern
Sending out for early feedback/flames. Michael S. Tsirkin (4): include/linux/compiler*.h: fix OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR include/linux/compiler.h: allow memory operands barriers: convert a control to a data dependency virtio: use dependent_ptr_mb Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h | 1 + drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 6 ++++-- include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 5 ++--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 4 ---- include/linux/compiler-intel.h | 4 +--- include/linux/compiler.h | 8 +++++++- 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)