Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2019-01-02

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] vhost: accelerate metadata access through vmap()

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-12-14 03:42:27
Also in: kvm, lkml

On 2018/12/13 下午11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:10:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
Hi:

This series tries to access virtqueue metadata through kernel virtual
address instead of copy_user() friends since they had too much
overheads like checks, spec barriers or even hardware feature
toggling.
Userspace accesses through remapping tricks and next time there's a need
for a new barrier we are left to figure it out by ourselves.

I don't get here, do you mean spec barriers? It's completely unnecessary 
for vhost which is kernel thread. And even if you're right, vhost is not 
the only place, there's lots of vmap() based accessing in kernel. Think 
in another direction, this means we won't suffer form unnecessary 
barriers for kthread like vhost in the future, we will manually pick the 
one we really need (but it should have little possibility).

Please notice we only access metdata through remapping not the data 
itself. This idea has been used for high speed userspace backend for 
years, e.g packet socket or recent AF_XDP. The only difference is the 
page was remap to from kernel to userspace.

   I don't
like the idea I have to say.  As a first step, why don't we switch to
unsafe_put_user/unsafe_get_user etc?

Several reasons:

- They only have x86 variant, it won't have any difference for the rest 
of architecture.

- unsafe_put_user/unsafe_get_user is not sufficient for accessing 
structures (e.g accessing descriptor) or arrays (batching).

- Unless we can batch at least the accessing of two places in three of 
avail, used and descriptor in one run. There will be no difference. E.g 
we can batch updating used ring, but it won't make any difference in 
this case.

That would be more of an apples to apples comparison, would it not?

Apples to apples comparison only help if we are the No.1. But the fact 
is we are not. If we want to compete with e.g dpdk or AF_XDP, vmap() is 
the fastest method AFAIK.


Thanks

quoted
Test shows about 24% improvement on TX PPS. It should benefit other
cases as well.

Please review

Jason Wang (3):
   vhost: generalize adding used elem
   vhost: fine grain userspace memory accessors
   vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address

  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  drivers/vhost/vhost.h |  11 ++
  2 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help