Hi Yohann,

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 22:53:32 +0200

"Yoann P." [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

When using ss -Hutn4 or -utn3, Netid and State columns are sometime
merged, it can be confusing when trying to pipe into awk or column.

Thanks for fixing this. A few comments though:

quoted

@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ static struct column columns[] = {

        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "State",                " ",    0, 0, 0 },
        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "Recv-Q",               " ",    0, 0, 0 },
        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "Send-Q",               " ",    0, 0, 0 },

-       { ALIGN_RIGHT,  "Local Address:",       " ",    0, 0, 0 },
+       { ALIGN_RIGHT,  "Local_Address:",       " ",    0, 0, 0 },

        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "Port",                 "",     0, 0, 0 },

-       { ALIGN_RIGHT,  "Peer Address:",        " ",    0, 0, 0 },
+       { ALIGN_RIGHT,  "Peer_Address:",        " ",    0, 0, 0 },

This is needed only if you pipe the output to column(1), I don't think
it's a bug, because printing the header when you pass the output to
column(1) makes little sense -- one should use -H then.

I don't really care about this modification, I came across it while making the 
github issue example, seemed to be little change, so I dit it.

By the way, why do you use column(1), when ss already prints output in
columns? Any other issue you are working around?

column can hide columns with "-H -" and is a bit faster than awk to output a 
single column according to time, it's the only reason I mentioned it.

quoted

        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "Port",                 "",     0, 0, 0 },
        { ALIGN_LEFT,   "",                     "",     0, 0, 0 },
 
 };

@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static void sock_state_print(struct sockstat *s)

                out("`- %s", sctp_sstate_name[s->state]);
        
        } else {
        
                field_set(COL_NETID);

-               out("%s", sock_name);
+               out("%-6s", sock_name);

I could reproduce this issue with a 70-columns terminal and the options
you gave.

Anyway, I don't think this is the right way to fix it: this will waste
one to two columns in case we have three letters for the Netid
specifier, and won't work the day we get six-letters names. In general,
it looks like a bad idea to reintroduce hardcoded width counts.

I agree, I just not found the proper way to do it (Not a programmer).

The actual issue seems to be that in some cases the left delimiter for
the State column is not printed, and I think you should fix that
instead. I'll look into this within a couple of days and give you some
more specific hints in case you still need them by then.