Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It never used since introduction in
commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <redacted>
---
net/rxrpc/output.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: 2018-10-09 17:29:35
YueHaibing [off-list ref] wrote:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It never used since introduction in
I wonder why my compiler doesn't show this warning.
Anyway, NAK: just removing the variable is the wrong fix - you need to look at
the code more closely. The actual fix is to pass it to kernel_sendmsg()
instead of 2.
But thanks anyway! Do you want to respin your patch?
commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Btw, this should be a 'Fixes: <commit> ("subject")' line and the patch needs
to go to net, not net-next.
David
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It never used since introduction in
I wonder why my compiler doesn't show this warning.
Just use make W=1
Anyway, NAK: just removing the variable is the wrong fix - you need to look at
the code more closely. The actual fix is to pass it to kernel_sendmsg()
instead of 2.
I didn't notice this, Thank you for correction.
But thanks anyway! Do you want to respin your patch?
Sure, I will fix it.
quoted
commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Btw, this should be a 'Fixes: <commit> ("subject")' line and the patch needs
to go to net, not net-next.
David
.
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
'ioc' is the correct kvec num while send response packet.
Fixes: commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <redacted>
---
net/rxrpc/output.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> Date: 2018-10-09 22:51:36
On 10/09/2018 05:15 PM, YueHaibing wrote:
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
'ioc' is the correct kvec num while send response packet.
Fixes: commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
'ioc' is the correct kvec num while send response packet.
Fixes: commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
'ioc' is the correct kvec num while send response packet.
Fixes: ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <redacted>
---
v3: remove 'commit' from Fixes info.
v2: use 'ioc' rather than remove it.
---
net/rxrpc/output.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden> Date: 2018-10-11 16:04:51
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 11:13:16AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
YueHaibing [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It never used since introduction in
I wonder why my compiler doesn't show this warning.
Anyway, NAK: just removing the variable is the wrong fix - you need to look at
the code more closely. The actual fix is to pass it to kernel_sendmsg()
instead of 2.
But thanks anyway! Do you want to respin your patch?
quoted
commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed to rather than ABORTs")
Btw, this should be a 'Fixes: <commit> ("subject")' line and the patch needs
to go to net, not net-next.
I told him to do that because it wasn't a bugfix... Probably just Fixes
is the right thing to use though.
regards,
dan carpenter