On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:54 PM Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:

be nice, but if the authors of that assembly are convinced it should be replaced, then this step is optional IMO.

I think this actually makes the patchset and maintenance of it a lot
more confusing, so I'm going to abort doing this. I'd rather make the
convincing argument for the assembly anyway.