On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:20:38 +0200
Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:43:34 +0100
Srinivas Kandagatla [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Overall am still not able to clear visualize on how MTD bindings with
nvmem cells would look in both partition and un-partition usecases?
An example DT would be nice here!!
Something along those lines:
We must also have a compatible string on the nvmem-cells node to make
sure we don't clash with the old style MTD partitions, or some other
device specific binding.
mtdnode {
nvmem-cells {
compatible = "nvmem-cells";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
cell@0 {
reg = <0x0 0x14>;
};
};
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
partition@0 {
reg = <0x0 0x20000>;
nvmem-cells {
compatible = "nvmem-cells";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
cell@0 {
reg = <0x0 0x10>;
};
};
};
};
};
Alban