Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dp83640: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <redacted>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:08:24 -0500

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment at the
top of the switch statement with a proper "fall through" annotation for
each case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>

Applied, thanks.