[PATCH net-next] net: dp83640: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-09 15:09:12
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment at the
top of the switch statement with a proper "fall through" annotation for
each case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
index 79e9b10..29aa8d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c@@ -757,13 +757,16 @@ static int decode_evnt(struct dp83640_private *dp83640, phy_txts = data; - switch (words) { /* fall through in every case */ + switch (words) { case 3: dp83640->edata.sec_hi = phy_txts->sec_hi; + /* fall through */ case 2: dp83640->edata.sec_lo = phy_txts->sec_lo; + /* fall through */ case 1: dp83640->edata.ns_hi = phy_txts->ns_hi; + /* fall through */ case 0: dp83640->edata.ns_lo = phy_txts->ns_lo; }
--
2.7.4