On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:08:53AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:

Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:06:37AM CEST, jiri@resnulli.us wrote:

quoted

Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:06:18AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote:

quoted

Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
failover infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>

In previous patchset versions, the common code did
netdev_rx_handler_register() and netdev_upper_dev_link() etc
(netvsc_vf_join()). Now, this is still done in netvsc. Why?

This should be part of the common "failover" code.

Also note that in the current patchset you use IFF_FAILOVER flag for
master, yet for the slave you use IFF_SLAVE. That is wrong.
IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE should be used.

Or drop IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE and set both IFF_FAILOVER and IFF_SLAVE?

-- 
MST