Re: [PATCH v3 net 2/5] tcp: prevent bogus FRTO undos with non-SACK flows
flat view
From: Ilpo Järvinen <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-04 10:35:24
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Ilpo Järvinen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
If SACK is not enabled and the first cumulative ACK after the RTO retransmission covers more than the retransmitted skb, a spurious FRTO undo will trigger (assuming FRTO is enabled for that RTO). The reason is that any non-retransmitted segment acknowledged will set FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED in tcp_clean_rtx_queue even if there is no indication that it would have been delivered for real (the scoreboard is not kept with TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits in the non-SACK case so the check for that bit won't help like it does with SACK). Having FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED set results in the spurious FRTO undo in tcp_process_loss. We need to use more strict condition for non-SACK case and check that none of the cumulatively ACKed segments were retransmitted to prove that progress is due to original transmissions. Only then keep FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED set, allowing FRTO undo to proceed in non-SACK case. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <redacted> --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 4a26c09..c60745c 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c@@ -3166,6 +3166,15 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, u32 prior_fack, pkts_acked = rexmit_acked + newdata_acked; tcp_remove_reno_sacks(sk, pkts_acked); + + /* If any of the cumulatively ACKed segments was + * retransmitted, non-SACK case cannot confirm that + * progress was due to original transmission due to + * lack of TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits even if some of + * the packets may have been never retransmitted. + */ + if (flag & FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED) + flag &= ~FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;How about keeping your excellent comment but move the fix to F-RTO code directly so it's more clear? this way the flag remains clear that indicates some never-retransmitted data are acked/sacked. // pseudo code for illustrationdiff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 8d480542aa07..f7f3357de618 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c@@ -2629,8 +2629,15 @@ static void tcp_process_loss(struct sock *sk,int flag, bool is_dupack, if (tp->frto) { /* F-RTO RFC5682 sec 3.1 (sack enhanced version). */ /* Step 3.b. A timeout is spurious if not all data are * lost, i.e., never-retransmitted data are (s)acked. + * + * If any of the cumulatively ACKed segments was + * retransmitted, non-SACK case cannot confirm that + * progress was due to original transmission due to + * lack of TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits even if some of + * the packets may have been never retransmitted. */ if ((flag & FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED) && + (tcp_is_sack(tp) || !FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED) && tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, true)) return;
Of course I could put the back there but I really like the new place more (which was a result of your suggestion to place the code elsewhere). IMHO, it makes more sense to have it in tcp_clean_rtx_queue() because we weren't successful in proving (there in tcp_clean_rtx_queue) that progress was due original transmission and thus I would not want falsely indicate it with that flag. And there's the non-SACK related block anyway already there so it keeps the non-SACK "pollution" off from the SACK code paths. (In addition, I'd actually also like to rename FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED to FLAG_ORIG_PROGRESS, the latter is more descriptive about the condition we're after regardless of SACK and less ambiguous in non-SACK case). -- i.