Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 4 authors, 2018-04-04

Re: [PATCH v3 net 2/5] tcp: prevent bogus FRTO undos with non-SACK flows

flat view

From: Ilpo Järvinen <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-04 10:35:24

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Ilpo Järvinen
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If SACK is not enabled and the first cumulative ACK after the RTO
retransmission covers more than the retransmitted skb, a spurious
FRTO undo will trigger (assuming FRTO is enabled for that RTO).
The reason is that any non-retransmitted segment acknowledged will
set FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED in tcp_clean_rtx_queue even if there is
no indication that it would have been delivered for real (the
scoreboard is not kept with TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits in the non-SACK
case so the check for that bit won't help like it does with SACK).
Having FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED set results in the spurious FRTO undo
in tcp_process_loss.

We need to use more strict condition for non-SACK case and check
that none of the cumulatively ACKed segments were retransmitted
to prove that progress is due to original transmissions. Only then
keep FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED set, allowing FRTO undo to proceed in
non-SACK case.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <redacted>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 4a26c09..c60745c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3166,6 +3166,15 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, u32 prior_fack,
                                pkts_acked = rexmit_acked + newdata_acked;

                        tcp_remove_reno_sacks(sk, pkts_acked);
+
+                       /* If any of the cumulatively ACKed segments was
+                        * retransmitted, non-SACK case cannot confirm that
+                        * progress was due to original transmission due to
+                        * lack of TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits even if some of
+                        * the packets may have been never retransmitted.
+                        */
+                       if (flag & FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED)
+                               flag &= ~FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
How about keeping your excellent comment but move the fix to F-RTO
code directly so it's more clear? this way the flag remains clear that
indicates some never-retransmitted data are acked/sacked.

// pseudo code for illustration
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 8d480542aa07..f7f3357de618 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2629,8 +2629,15 @@ static void tcp_process_loss(struct sock *sk,
int flag, bool is_dupack,
        if (tp->frto) { /* F-RTO RFC5682 sec 3.1 (sack enhanced version). */
                /* Step 3.b. A timeout is spurious if not all data are
                 * lost, i.e., never-retransmitted data are (s)acked.
+                *
+                * If any of the cumulatively ACKed segments was
+                * retransmitted, non-SACK case cannot confirm that
+                * progress was due to original transmission due to
+                * lack of TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED bits even if some of
+                * the packets may have been never retransmitted.
                 */
                if ((flag & FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED) &&
+                   (tcp_is_sack(tp) || !FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED) &&
                    tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, true))
                        return;
Of course I could put the back there but I really like the new place more 
(which was a result of your suggestion to place the code elsewhere).
IMHO, it makes more sense to have it in tcp_clean_rtx_queue() because we 
weren't successful in proving (there in tcp_clean_rtx_queue) that progress 
was due original transmission and thus I would not want falsely indicate 
it with that flag. And there's the non-SACK related block anyway already 
there so it keeps the non-SACK "pollution" off from the SACK code paths.

(In addition, I'd actually also like to rename FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED to 
FLAG_ORIG_PROGRESS, the latter is more descriptive about the condition 
we're after regardless of SACK and less ambiguous in non-SACK case).

-- 
 i.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help