Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 6 authors, 2018-03-23

Re: [PATCH 06/28] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-03-22 18:16:57
Also in: linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
-static void aio_complete(struct aio_kiocb *iocb, long res, long res2)
+static bool aio_complete(struct aio_kiocb *iocb, long res, long res2,
+		unsigned complete_flags)
Looks like all callers are following that with "if returned true,
fput(something)".  Does it really make any sense to keep that struct
file * in different fields?

Wait a sec...  What ordering do we want for
	* call(s) of ->ki_complete
	* call (if any) of ->ki_cancel
	* dropping reference to struct file
and what are the expected call chains for all of those?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help