Re: [PATCH 06/28] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2018-03-23 18:05:22
Also in:
linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 06:16:53PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
-static void aio_complete(struct aio_kiocb *iocb, long res, long res2) +static bool aio_complete(struct aio_kiocb *iocb, long res, long res2, + unsigned complete_flags)Looks like all callers are following that with "if returned true, fput(something)". Does it really make any sense to keep that struct file * in different fields?
struct kiocb is used not just for aio, but for our normal read/write_iter APIs, and it is not suitable for poll or fsync. So I can't really find a good way to keep it common except for duplicating it in struct kiocb and strut aio_iocb. But maybe we could pass a struct file argument to aio_complete().
Wait a sec... What ordering do we want for * call(s) of ->ki_complete * call (if any) of ->ki_cancel * dropping reference to struct file and what are the expected call chains for all of those?
fput must be done exactly once from inside ->ki_complete OR ->ki_cancel in case it did manage to do the actual completion. Reference to struct file isn't needed in aio_complete, but if aio_complete decided who won the race we'll have to put after it (or inside it if we want to make it common) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>