Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:31:02PM CET, dsa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 3/23/18 12:50 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
quoted
+void nsim_devlink_setup(struct netdevsim *ns)
+{
+ struct net *net = dev_net(ns->netdev);
+ bool *reg_devlink = net_generic(net, nsim_devlink_id);
+ struct devlink *devlink;
+ int err = -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* only one device per namespace controls devlink */
+ if (!*reg_devlink) {
+ ns->devlink = NULL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ devlink = devlink_alloc(&nsim_devlink_ops, 0);
+ if (!devlink)
+ return;
+
+ devlink_net_set(devlink, net);
+ err = devlink_register(devlink, &ns->dev);
This reg_devlink construct looks odd. Why don't you leave the devlink
instance in init_ns?
It is a per-network namespace resource controller. Since struct devlink
Wait a second. What do you mean by "per-network namespace"? Devlink
instance is always associated with one physical device. Like an ASIC.
has a net entry, the simplest design is to put it into the namespace of
the controller. Without it, controlling resource sizes in namespace
'foobar' has to be done from init_net, which is just wrong.