Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2018-02-13

RE: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

From: Brown, Aaron F <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-13 20:54:14
Also in: intel-wired-lan, kernel-janitors, lkml

From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christophe JAILLET
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:48 AM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <redacted>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Christophe
JAILLET [off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is
1
and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.

See 'struct hwtstamp_config' in 'include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h'

This fixes a warning reported by smatch:
   igb_xmit_frame_ring() warn: bit shifter 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' used for
logical '&'

Fixes: 26bd4e2db06be ("igb: protect TX timestamping from API misuse")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help