On 2/4/18 5:11 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:17:01AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100
Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk,
+ struct nlattr *tb[],
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL;
+
+ /* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify
+ * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so
+ * don't regress them.
+ */
+ if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD])
+ return 0;
Isn't this an error?
My reasoning was that having no explicit network namespace identifying
attributes the caller operates on the current network namespace which is
uniquely identified.
agreed. those are not required attributes.