On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 07:09:55PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
On 2/3/18 12:17 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100
Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk,
+ struct nlattr *tb[],
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL;
+
+ /* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify
+ * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so
+ * don't regress them.
+ */
+ if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD])
+ return 0;
Isn't this an error?
quoted
+
+ unique_net = get_net_ns_by_id(sock_net(sk), nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]));
+ if (!unique_net)
+ return -1;
Other paths are returning errno, so why -1 here?
extack needs to be filled in too.
Yeah, it should report that an invalid network namespace identifier has
been specified.
Thanks!
Christian