Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] net: add bpfilter
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-02-20 14:55:37
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:44:31 +0100
* Lack of sufficient abstraction: bpf is not only exposing its own software bugs through its interface, but it will also bite the dust with CPU bugs due to lack of glue code to hide details behind the syscall interface curtain. That will need a kernel upgrade after all to fix, so all benefits of adding new programs. We've even seem claims on performance being more important than security in this mailing list. Don't get me wrong, no software is safe from security issues, but if you don't abstract your resources in the right way, you have more chance to have experimence more problems.
I find it surprising that the person who didn't even know that generating classical BPF was not appropriate in his patches is suddenly a complete expert on eBPF and all of it's shortcomings. Pablo, I am sincerely very disappointed in you, and if you continue to attack eBPF in such an ignorant way going forward we will have a very hard time taking you seriously at all. Thank you.