Thread (73 messages) flat view 73 messages, 13 authors, 2018-02-22

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] net: add bpfilter

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-02-20 14:55:37

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:44:31 +0100
* Lack of sufficient abstraction: bpf is not only exposing its own
  software bugs through its interface, but it will also bite the dust
  with CPU bugs due to lack of glue code to hide details behind the
  syscall interface curtain.  That will need a kernel upgrade after all to
  fix, so all benefits of adding new programs. We've even seem claims on
  performance being more important than security in this mailing list.
  Don't get me wrong, no software is safe from security issues, but if you
  don't abstract your resources in the right way, you have more chance to
  have experimence more problems.
I find it surprising that the person who didn't even know that
generating classical BPF was not appropriate in his patches is
suddenly a complete expert on eBPF and all of it's shortcomings.

Pablo, I am sincerely very disappointed in you, and if you continue
to attack eBPF in such an ignorant way going forward we will have
a very hard time taking you seriously at all.

Thank you.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help