Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 07:41 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Syzbot reported a WARN() in proc_create_data() [1]
Issue here is that xt_hashlimit does not check that user space provided
an empty table name.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
index 5da8746f7b88ff4c9446f256e542e823a6a561b0..eae732e013df92a364b500645360d4606c283a75 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
return -ERANGE;
}
+ if (!name[0])
+ return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&hashlimit_mutex);
*hinfo = htable_find_get(net, name, par->family);
if (*hinfo == NULL) {
I wonder if we should also check if name includes a '/' ?
if (!name[0] || strchr(name, '/'))
return -EINVAL;
I think there should be a helper for this to reject
- 0 length
- /
- .
- ..
in hashlimit case name is IFNMASIZ so we could even use
dev_valid_name() here.