Thread (43 messages) flat view 43 messages, 8 authors, 2018-02-13

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v2 net-next 01/10] net: Add a new socket option for a future transmit time.

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-01-25 16:52:25
Also in: intel-wired-lan

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
Do I understand it correctly that no other interface is using
nanoseconds since 1970? We probably don't have to worry about year
2262 yet, but wouldn't it be better to make it consistent with the
timestamping API using timespec? Or is it just better to avoid the
64/32-bit mess of time_t?
I prefer a single 64 bit nanoseconds field:

- Applications won't have to convert to timespec.

- Avoids the time_t issue.

Thanks,
Richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help