Re: [RFC v2 net-next 01/10] net: Add a new socket option for a future transmit time.
From: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-23 18:25:30
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
Hi, On 01/19/2018 01:15 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Richard Cochran <redacted> This patch introduces SO_TXTIME. User space enables this option in order to pass a desired future transmit time in a CMSG when calling sendmsg(2). A new field is added to struct sockcm_cookie, and the tstamp from skbuffs will be used later on. Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <redacted> ---quoted
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index abf4cbff99b2..37ef4b33fd92 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c@@ -1061,6 +1061,13 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY, valbool); break; + case SO_TXTIME: + if (ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) + sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME, valbool); + else + ret = -EPERM; + break; + default: ret = -ENOPROTOOPT; break;Please add getsockopt alongside setsockopt. I would also restrict input to [0, 1] exactly to allow for future extensions.
Ok, will do.
If using ns_capable, skb->tstamp must continue to be scrubbed when traversing network namespaces.
I was planning to follow Eric's suggestion and move the tstamp scrubbing out of skb_scrub_packet() into ____dev_forward_skb() instead. Would that break when traversing namespaces?
quoted
@@ -2130,6 +2137,15 @@ int __sock_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct cmsghdr *cmsg, sockc->tsflags &= ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK; sockc->tsflags |= tsflags; break; + case SO_TXTIME: + if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) + return -EPERM; + if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME)) + return -EINVAL;No need for ns_capable check on each packet when already required to toggle socket option.
Ok. SO_MARK is doing the same so it might have "mis-inspired" me. I should probably fix both.
quoted
+ if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(ktime_t))) + return -EINVAL;I don't see any existing reference to ktime_t in include/uapi. Just use a s64?
Sure, will fix. Thanks, Jesus