Re: [patch net-next v2 00/10] Add support for resource abstraction
From: Arkadi Sharshevsky <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-04 00:07:29
On 01/03/2018 08:29 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 1/3/18 11:17 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 07:14:16PM CET, dsa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:quoted
On 1/3/18 11:05 AM, Arkadi Sharshevsky wrote:quoted
As I stated this is a user-space bug which I fixed, and updated my repo so please pull. Devlink uses mnl,and currently mnl does not support extended ack. I added support for this in my local ver of libmnl: https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Farkadis%2Flibmnl.git&data=02%7C01%7Carkadis%40mellanox.com%7C5c86b6240eb84459c6ae08d552d7f9a4%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636506009929977440&sdata=sgrNzMhPwe63BIVxexZTjl%2FXqW51kpuRiHVhTDNaa70%3D&reserved=0 On branch master, so you can check it out. Besides this bugs, which were userspace, can please specify what are the pending problems from your point of view? Thanks!devlink is in iproute2 package and it has extack support. See 'git log lib/libnetlink.c'Dave, devlink uses libmnl.Now I remember. You wrote it independently and but needed iproute2 be a delivery vehicle. It uses none of the common infrastructure from iproute2. Could we make this more difficult .... Sometime in the next day I will jump through the hoops to get a proper devlink command.
This actually was very confusing, I think the extack should be handled by libmnl and iproute should use mnl_cb_run() routines and not to implement its own. That way we could both benefit from that. You actually do use libmnl in libnetlink.c only for parsing the headers, and its a dependency for extack handling. I see this as a completely independent user space issue, which doesn't have to do anything with this patchset. Not to mention that everything is working right now.