Dear Masami-san,

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
[off-list ref] wrote:
[...]

Then what I'm considering is copyright notice lines. Those are usually
treat as the header lines, not single line. So

quoted

+// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
+// Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
+// Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.

is acceptable? or should we keep C-style header lines for new drivers?

quoted

+// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
+ * Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
+ * Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
+ */

I just concern that those lines are not "single". that's all. :)

My voice carries the weight of a down feather in this discussion and
to me the benefit of the first form is that you have removed two
lines. Both forms work fine.

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html