Thread (105 messages) flat view 105 messages, 14 authors, 2017-11-22

Re: [PATCH 24/31] nds32: Miscellaneous header files

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2017-11-08 09:57:45
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Greentime Hu [off-list ref] wrote:
+
+static inline void __delay(unsigned long loops)
+{
+       __asm__ __volatile__(".align 2\n"
+                            "1:\n"
+                            "\taddi\t%0, %0, -1\n"
+                            "\tbgtz\t%0, 1b\n"
+                            :"=r"(loops)
+                            :"0"(loops));
+}
Does the architecture define a high-resolution clock source? If yes,
then it's better
to use that to get exact timing than to rely on the loop calibration.
+/*
+ * This file is generally used by user-level software, so you need to
+ * be a little careful about namespace pollution etc.  Also, we cannot
+ * assume GCC is being used.
+ */
+
+typedef unsigned short __kernel_mode_t;
+#define __kernel_mode_t __kernel_mode_t
+
+typedef unsigned short __kernel_ipc_pid_t;
+#define __kernel_ipc_pid_t __kernel_ipc_pid_t
+
+typedef unsigned short __kernel_uid_t;
+typedef unsigned short __kernel_gid_t;
+#define __kernel_uid_t __kernel_uid_t
+
+typedef unsigned short __kernel_old_dev_t;
+#define __kernel_old_dev_t __kernel_old_dev_t
+
+#include <asm-generic/posix_types.h>
I don't understand why you would want to override any of those.
Changing them unfortunately means rebuilding all of your user
space, but I think it would be better to do that now than to suffer
from this later on.

      Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help