Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2017-11-08

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-23 01:39:46
Also in: linux-hams, lkml

Quoting David Miller [off-list ref]:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <redacted>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:08:40 -0500
quoted
Code refactoring in order to make it easier to read and maintain.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
Gustavo, always when reposting a new version of a patch that is part of
a series you must _always_ repost the entire patch series.
OK. I got it.
Also, a proper patch series must begine with a "[PATCH 0/2] ..."
header posting explaining at a high level what the patch series
is doing, how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that way.
Yeah, in this case I thought there was no need for this as both  
patches are not actually related in terms of functionality. But now  
that I'm writing this, maybe that is precisely the reason why I should  
have posted such header...?

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva






Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help