Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2017-11-08

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node

From: walter harms <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-20 08:57:10
Also in: linux-hams


Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).

 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
index fc9cadc..1e5165f 100644
--- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
@@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ static struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh_get_dev(ax25_address *callsign,
 
 static void nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *);
 
+/*      re-sort the routes in quality order.    */
+static inline void re_sort_routes(struct nr_node *nr_node, int ix_x, int ix_y)
+{
+	struct nr_route nr_route;
+
+	if (nr_node->routes[ix_y].quality > nr_node->routes[ix_x].quality) {
+		if (nr_node->which == ix_x)
+			nr_node->which = ix_y;
+		else if (nr_node->which == ix_y)
+			nr_node->which = ix_x;
+
+		nr_route              = nr_node->routes[ix_x];
+		nr_node->routes[ix_x] = nr_node->routes[ix_y];
+		nr_node->routes[ix_y] = nr_route;
+	}
+}
+

Good idea, a bit of nit picking ..
does ix_ has a special meaning ? otherwise x,y would be sufficient.
From the code below i can see: y=x+1 Perhaps that can be used.
kernel.h has a swap() macro. so you can swap(nr_node->routes[x],nr_node->routes[y]);

hope that helps,
re,
 wh
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 /*
  *	Add a new route to a node, and in the process add the node and the
  *	neighbour if it is new.
@@ -90,7 +107,6 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 {
 	struct nr_node  *nr_node;
 	struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh;
-	struct nr_route nr_route;
 	int i, found;
 	struct net_device *odev;
 
@@ -251,50 +267,11 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 	/* Now re-sort the routes in quality order */
 	switch (nr_node->count) {
 	case 3:
-		if (nr_node->routes[1].quality > nr_node->routes[0].quality) {
-			switch (nr_node->which) {
-			case 0:
-				nr_node->which = 1;
-				break;
-			case 1:
-				nr_node->which = 0;
-				break;
-			}
-			nr_route           = nr_node->routes[0];
-			nr_node->routes[0] = nr_node->routes[1];
-			nr_node->routes[1] = nr_route;
-		}
-		if (nr_node->routes[2].quality > nr_node->routes[1].quality) {
-			switch (nr_node->which) {
-			case 1:  nr_node->which = 2;
-				break;
-
-			case 2:  nr_node->which = 1;
-				break;
-
-			default:
-				break;
-			}
-			nr_route           = nr_node->routes[1];
-			nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
-			nr_node->routes[2] = nr_route;
-		}
+		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
+		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 1, 2);
 		/* fall through */
 	case 2:
-		if (nr_node->routes[1].quality > nr_node->routes[0].quality) {
-			switch (nr_node->which) {
-			case 0:  nr_node->which = 1;
-				break;
-
-			case 1:  nr_node->which = 0;
-				break;
-
-			default: break;
-			}
-			nr_route           = nr_node->routes[0];
-			nr_node->routes[0] = nr_node->routes[1];
-			nr_node->routes[1] = nr_route;
-			}
+		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
 	case 1:
 		break;
 	}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help