Re: [RFC net-next 0/4] net: phy: PHY_HALTED, the return of the state
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2017-10-27 11:35:33
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi all,
This patch series tries to address the shortcomings of the previously and then
quickly reverted commit 7ad813f208533cebfcc32d3d7474dc1677d1b09a ("net: phy:
Correctly process PHY_HALTED in phy_stop_machine()")
This time, the empire returns and strikes back with a few additional changes:
- catch phy_disconnect() calls without prior phy_stop() and warn when that
happens since that means a driver is not behaving properly. This is AFAIR
the case in which David Daney ran into
- what David also was running into is that when the PHY state machine was
already in PHY_HALTED, its synchronous call in phy_disconnect() would make
us re-schedule ourselves at the end. This is unnecessary, and we now take
care of that
- finally, Geert experienced bus errors on smsc911x for a number of reasons,
but the primary one is that the driver does not do any management of the
PHY state machine during suspend/resume. The last patch corrects that, and
also suggests that the driver should be fixed to properly support Wake-on-LAN
configuration to possibly suspend the PHY.
David, Marc and Geert, I would appreciate if you could give this patch series
a spin on your respective HW and confirm that the desired functionality is
achieved.Hi Florian I quickly look through these patches and they all seem sensible. Feedback from the listed people would however be good. Andrew