Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2017-12-04

Re: [RFC net-next 0/4] net: phy: PHY_HALTED, the return of the state

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2017-10-27 11:35:33

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi all,

This patch series tries to address the shortcomings of the previously and then
quickly reverted commit 7ad813f208533cebfcc32d3d7474dc1677d1b09a ("net: phy:
Correctly process PHY_HALTED in phy_stop_machine()")

This time, the empire returns and strikes back with a few additional changes:

- catch phy_disconnect() calls without prior phy_stop() and warn when that
  happens since that means a driver is not behaving properly. This is AFAIR
  the case in which David Daney ran into

- what David also was running into is that when the PHY state machine was
  already in PHY_HALTED, its synchronous call in phy_disconnect() would make
  us re-schedule ourselves at the end. This is unnecessary, and we now take
  care of that

- finally, Geert experienced bus errors on smsc911x for a number of reasons,
  but the primary one is that the driver does not do any management of the
  PHY state machine during suspend/resume. The last patch corrects that, and
  also suggests that the driver should be fixed to properly support Wake-on-LAN
  configuration to possibly suspend the PHY.

David, Marc and Geert, I would appreciate if you could give this patch series
a spin on your respective HW and confirm that the desired functionality is
achieved.
Hi Florian

I quickly look through these patches and they all seem
sensible. Feedback from the listed people would however be good.

	  Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help