Re: [PATCHv5 iproute2 net-next 2/2] lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough

On 10/26/17 4:24 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

quoted

The kernel needs a flag that says "give me the message of the buffer is
large enough; if not just PEEK and tell me the length." That would avoid
the double call in most cases.

Actually this has little impact because old code was doing implicit zero
of whole buffer, new code does not.

The patch calls recvmsg twice; libnl does the same thing. It would be
better performance wise to have a flag that allows retrieval of the
message if the supplied buffer is large enough and PEEK semantics if
not. It was really a comment on how we could do better with proper
kernel support.