On 10/25/17 7:41 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
+static int rtnl_recvmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, char **answer)
+{
+ struct iovec *iov = msg->msg_iov;
+ char *buf;
+ int len;
+
+ iov->iov_base = NULL;
+ iov->iov_len = 0;
+
+ len = __rtnl_recvmsg(fd, msg, MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC);
+ if (len < 0)
+ return len;
+
+ buf = malloc(len);
+ if (!buf) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "malloc error: not enough buffer\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ iov->iov_base = buf;
+ iov->iov_len = len;
+
+ len = __rtnl_recvmsg(fd, msg, 0);
+ if (len < 0) {
+ free(buf);
+ return len;
+ }
The kernel needs a flag that says "give me the message of the buffer is
large enough; if not just PEEK and tell me the length." That would avoid
the double call in most cases.