Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2017-09-26

Re: [PATCH net-next] sch_netem: faster rb tree removal

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-25 05:27:24

On Sun, 2017-09-24 at 20:05 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 9/24/17 7:57 PM, David Ahern wrote:
quoted
Hi Eric:

I'm guessing the cost is in the rb_first and rb_next computations. Did
you consider something like this:

        struct rb_root *root
        struct rb_node **p = &root->rb_node;

        while (*p != NULL) {
                struct foobar *fb;

                fb = container_of(*p, struct foobar, rb_node);
                // fb processing
		  rb_erase(&nh->rb_node, root);
quoted
                p = &root->rb_node;
        }
Oops, dropped the rb_erase in my consolidating the code to this snippet.
Hi David

This gives about same numbers than method_1

I tried with 10^7 skbs in the tree :

Your suggestion takes 66ns per skb, while the one I chose takes 37ns per
skb.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help