[PATCH net-next] sch_netem: faster rb tree removal
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-23 18:07:30
Subsystem:
netem network emulator, networking [general], tc subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Stephen Hemminger, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Jamal Hadi Salim, Jiri Pirko, Linus Torvalds
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
While running TCP tests involving netem storing millions of packets,
I had the idea to speed up tfifo_reset() and did experiments.
I tried the rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() method that is
used in skb_rbtree_purge() but discovered it was slower than the
current tfifo_reset() method.
I measured time taken to release skbs with three occupation levels :
10^4, 10^5 and 10^6 skbs with three methods :
1) (current 'naive' method)
while ((p = rb_first(&q->t_root))) {
struct sk_buff *skb = netem_rb_to_skb(p);
rb_erase(p, &q->t_root);
rtnl_kfree_skbs(skb, skb);
}
2) Use rb_next() instead of rb_first() in the loop :
p = rb_first(&q->t_root);
while (p) {
struct sk_buff *skb = netem_rb_to_skb(p);
p = rb_next(p);
rb_erase(&skb->rbnode, &q->t_root);
rtnl_kfree_skbs(skb, skb);
}
3) "optimized" method using rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()
struct sk_buff *skb, *next;
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(skb, next,
&q->t_root, rbnode) {
rtnl_kfree_skbs(skb, skb);
}
q->t_root = RB_ROOT;
Results :
method_1:while (rb_first()) rb_erase() 10000 skbs in 690378 ns (69 ns per skb)
method_2:rb_first; while (p) { p = rb_next(p); ...} 10000 skbs in 541846 ns (54 ns per skb)
method_3:rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() 10000 skbs in 868307 ns (86 ns per skb)
method_1:while (rb_first()) rb_erase() 99996 skbs in 7804021 ns (78 ns per skb)
method_2:rb_first; while (p) { p = rb_next(p); ...} 100000 skbs in 5942456 ns (59 ns per skb)
method_3:rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() 100000 skbs in 11584940 ns (115 ns per skb)
method_1:while (rb_first()) rb_erase() 1000000 skbs in 108577838 ns (108 ns per skb)
method_2:rb_first; while (p) { p = rb_next(p); ...} 1000000 skbs in 82619635 ns (82 ns per skb)
method_3:rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() 1000000 skbs in 127328743 ns (127 ns per skb)
Method 2) is simply faster, probably because it maintains a smaller
working size set.
Note that this is the method we use in tcp_ofo_queue() already.
I will also change skb_rbtree_purge() in a second patch.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/sched/sch_netem.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
index 063a4bdb9ee6f26b01387959e8f6ccd15ec16191..5a4f1008029068372019a965186e7a3c0a18aac3 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c@@ -361,12 +361,13 @@ static psched_time_t packet_len_2_sched_time(unsigned int len, struct netem_sche static void tfifo_reset(struct Qdisc *sch) { struct netem_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch); - struct rb_node *p; + struct rb_node *p = rb_first(&q->t_root); - while ((p = rb_first(&q->t_root))) { + while (p) { struct sk_buff *skb = netem_rb_to_skb(p); - rb_erase(p, &q->t_root); + p = rb_next(p); + rb_erase(&skb->rbnode, &q->t_root); rtnl_kfree_skbs(skb, skb); } }