Re: [net-next 1/2] dummy: add device MTU validation check
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Date: 2017-09-22 08:56:17
2017-09-21, 08:02:18 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 21:32 +0800, Zhang Shengju wrote:quoted
Currently, any mtu value can be assigned when adding a new dummy device: [~]# ip link add name dummy1 mtu 100000 type dummy [~]# ip link show dummy1 15: dummy1: <BROADCAST,NOARP> mtu 100000 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:61:6b:16:14:ce brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff This patch adds device MTU validation check.What is wrong with big MTU on dummy ?
It looks like the "centralize MTU checking" series broke that, but only for changing the MTU on an existing dummy device. Commit a52ad514fdf3 defined min_mtu/max_mtu in ether_setup, which dummy uses, but there was no MTU check in dummy prior to that commit.
If this is a generic rule, this check should belong in core network stack.quoted
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <redacted> --- drivers/net/dummy.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/dummy.c b/drivers/net/dummy.c index e31ab3b..0276b2b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dummy.c +++ b/drivers/net/dummy.c@@ -365,6 +365,14 @@ static int dummy_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[], if (!is_valid_ether_addr(nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]))) return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; } + + if (tb[IFLA_MTU]) { + u32 mtu = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_MTU]);You do not verify/validate nla_len(tb[IFLA_MTU]).
I think ifla_policy already performs that check:
static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
[...]
[IFLA_MTU] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
static int rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
[...]
err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*ifm), tb, IFLA_MAX, ifla_policy, extack);
--
Sabrina