Thread (29 messages) flat view 29 messages, 4 authors, 2017-09-19

RE: [PATCH net-next 05/12] net: dsa: b53: Use a macro to define I/O operations

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-09-19 14:29:43

On September 19, 2017 7:19:35 AM PDT, Vivien Didelot [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi David,

David Laight [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
From: Florian Fainelli
quoted
Sent: 18 September 2017 22:41
Instead of repeating the same pattern: acquire mutex, read/write,
release
quoted
quoted
mutex, define a macro: b53_build_op() which takes the type
(read|write), I/O
quoted
quoted
size, and value (scalar or pointer). This helps with fixing bugs
that could
quoted
quoted
exit (e.g: missing barrier, lock etc.).
....
quoted
+#define b53_build_op(type, op_size, val_type)	\
+static inline int b53_##type##op_size(struct b53_device *dev, u8
page,		\
quoted
quoted
+				      u8 reg, val_type val)			\
+{										\
+	int ret;								\
+										\
+	mutex_lock(&dev->reg_mutex);						\
+	ret = dev->ops->type##op_size(dev, page, reg, val);			\
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->reg_mutex);						\
+										\
+	return ret;								\
 }
Why separate the 'type' and 'op_size' arguments since they
are always pasted together?
For read/write48, the value type is u64.
The way I read David's comment is that instead of calling the macro with read, 48, just combine that in a single argument: read48. I don't have a preference about that and can respin eventually.

-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help