Re: [PATCH iproute2 3/3] bridge: request vlans along with link information
From: Roopa Prabhu <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-10 05:28:01
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/09/17 20:23, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:quoted
On 17-09-09 12:24 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Roman Mashak [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <redacted> ---
[snip]
quoted
quoted
vlan information is already available with `bridge vlan show`. any specific reason why you want it in the link dump output ? The problem is this might just make the link dump larger and also add too much clutter into the regular link dump output. iproute2 detailed dump is already a bit hard to interpret. And without compression by default, vlan info can just take over the link dump output. It will be hard to look for other link attributes after that :). We deploy with thousands of vlans and without compression even bridge vlan default output is already hard to interpret.Agree we should be turning on this stuff by default. i.e default stays compressed; otherwise it a huge dump.I think this should be dumped with the getlink request only on some additional flag. The getlink does not include these by default.quoted
Having said that there is a lot of mess with this stuff. The bridge link events _already send this IFLA_AF_SPCE info_ so not much choice there but to print it.Right, on NEWLINK per port notification you'll get the compressed vlan info.quoted
At minimal we need that part because unfortunately there is no vlanfilter event in existence which will send us summaries of just vlans added to a port i.e both use XXXLINK.But let's either add a new flag or use -compressvlans to print it when monitoring/showing link otherwise people who are monitoring only the port flags will start getting lists with vlans. Even compressed these can still be quite long and confusing, especially when monitoring.
yes agree. It will add too much clutter to the monitor output too.