On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 02:49:20PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
From: Phil Sutter
quoted
Sent: 01 September 2017 17:53
By making use of strncpy(), both implementations are really simple so
there is no need to add libbsd as additional dependency.
...
quoted
+
+size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
+{
+ if (size) {
+ strncpy(dst, src, size - 1);
+ dst[size - 1] = '\0';
+ }
+ return strlen(src);
+}
Except that isn't really strlcpy().
Better would be:
len = strlen(src) + 1;
if (len <= size)
memcpy(dst, src, len);
else if (size) {
dst[size - 1] = 0;
memcpy(dst, src, size - 1);
}
return len - 1;
Please elaborate: Why isn't my version "really" strlcpy()? Why is your
proposed version better?
Thanks, Phil