Re: [PATCH net-next v7 03/10] bpf,landlock: Define an eBPF program type for a Landlock rule
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Date: 2017-08-25 08:03:32
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
On 24/08/2017 04:28, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:09:26AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:quoted
Add a new type of eBPF program used by Landlock rules. This new BPF program type will be registered with the Landlock LSM initialization. Add an initial Landlock Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Morris <redacted> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> --- Changes since v6: * add 3 more sub-events: IOCTL, LOCK, FCNTL https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2fbc99a6-f190-f335-bd14-04bdeed35571@digikod.net * rename LANDLOCK_VERSION to LANDLOCK_ABI to better reflect its purpose, and move it from landlock.h to common.h * rename BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK to BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE: an eBPF program could be used for something else than a rule * simplify struct landlock_context by removing the arch and syscall_nr fields * remove all eBPF map functions call, remove ABILITY_WRITE * refactor bpf_landlock_func_proto() (suggested by Kees Cook) * constify pointers * fix doc inclusion Changes since v5: * rename file hooks.c to init.c * fix spelling Changes since v4: * merge a minimal (not enabled) LSM code and Kconfig in this commit Changes since v3: * split commit * revamp the landlock_context: * add arch, syscall_nr and syscall_cmd (ioctl, fcntl…) to be able to cross-check action with the event type * replace args array with dedicated fields to ease the addition of new fields --- include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 ++ include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/Kconfig | 1 + security/Makefile | 2 + security/landlock/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++ security/landlock/Makefile | 3 ++ security/landlock/common.h | 21 +++++++++ security/landlock/init.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 340 insertions(+) create mode 100644 security/landlock/Kconfig create mode 100644 security/landlock/Makefile create mode 100644 security/landlock/common.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/init.cdiff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h index 6f1a567667b8..8bac93970a47 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, kprobe_prog_ops) BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, tracepoint_prog_ops) BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, perf_event_prog_ops) #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE, bpf_landlock_ops) +#endif BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops) BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, percpu_array_map_ops)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 8541ab85e432..20da634da941 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type { BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE, }; enum bpf_attach_type {@@ -879,4 +880,100 @@ enum { #define TCP_BPF_IW 1001 /* Set TCP initial congestion window */ #define TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP 1002 /* Set sndcwnd_clamp */ +/** + * enum landlock_subtype_event - event occurring when an action is performed on + * a particular kernel object + * + * An event is a policy decision point which exposes the same context type + * (especially the same arg[0-9] field types) for each rule execution. + * + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_UNSPEC: invalid value + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS: generic filesystem event + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_IOCTL: custom IOCTL sub-event + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_LOCK: custom LOCK sub-event + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL: custom FCNTL sub-event + */ +enum landlock_subtype_event { + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_UNSPEC, + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS, + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_IOCTL, + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_LOCK, + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL, +}; +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_LAST LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL + +/** + * DOC: landlock_subtype_ability + * + * eBPF context and functions allowed for a rule + * + * - LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG: allows to do debug actions (e.g. writing + * logs), which may be dangerous and should only be used for rule testing + */ +#define LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG (1ULL << 0) +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_NB 1 +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_NB) - 1)can you move the last two macros out of uapi? There is really no need for the implementation details to leak into uapi.
Right, I'll move them.
quoted
+ +/* + * Future options for a Landlock rule (e.g. run even if a previous rule denied + * an action). + */ +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_NB 0 +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_NB) - 1)same herequoted
+ +/* + * Status visible in the @status field of a context (e.g. already called in + * this syscall session, with same args...). + * + * The @status field exposed to a rule shall depend on the rule version. + */ +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_NB 0 +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_NB) - 1)and herequoted
+ +/** + * DOC: landlock_action_fs + * + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_EXEC: execute a file or walk through a directory + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_WRITE: modify a file or a directory view (which + * include mount actions) + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_READ: read a file or a directory + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NEW: create a file or a directory + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_GET: open or receive a file + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_REMOVE: unlink a file or remove a directory + * + * Each of the following actions are specific to syscall multiplexers. Each of + * them trigger a dedicated Landlock event where their command can be read. + * + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_IOCTL: ioctl command + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_LOCK: flock or fcntl lock command + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_FCNTL: fcntl command + */ +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_EXEC (1ULL << 0) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_WRITE (1ULL << 1) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_READ (1ULL << 2) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NEW (1ULL << 3) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_GET (1ULL << 4) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_REMOVE (1ULL << 5) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_IOCTL (1ULL << 6) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_LOCK (1ULL << 7) +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_FCNTL (1ULL << 8) +#define _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NB 9 +#define _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NB) - 1)and herequoted
+ + +/** + * struct landlock_context - context accessible to a Landlock rule + * + * @status: bitfield for future use (LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_*) + * @event: event type (&enum landlock_subtype_event) + * @arg1: event's first optional argument + * @arg2: event's second optional argument + */ +struct landlock_context { + __u64 status; + __u64 event; + __u64 arg1; + __u64 arg2; +};looking at all the uapi additions.. probably worth moving them into separate .h like we did with bpf_perf_event.h How about include/uapi/linux/landlock.h ? It can include bpf.h first thing and then the rest of landlock related bits. so all, but BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE will go there.
Sounds good.
quoted
+++ b/security/landlock/Kconfig@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +config SECURITY_LANDLOCK + bool "Landlock sandbox support" + depends on SECURITY + depends on BPF_SYSCALL + depends on SECCOMP_FILTER + default yall new features need to start with default n
OK
quoted
+static inline const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_landlock_func_proto( + enum bpf_func_id func_id, + const union bpf_prog_subtype *prog_subtype) +{ + /* generic functions */ + if (prog_subtype->landlock_rule.ability & + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG) { + switch (func_id) { + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_comm: + return &bpf_get_current_comm_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid: + return &bpf_get_current_pid_tgid_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_uid_gid: + return &bpf_get_current_uid_gid_proto;why current_*() helpers are 'debug' only?
This helpers should not be needed for access control. It sounds like a really bad idea to rely on a command name, a PID or even the UID, especially for a kind of hierarchy-based access control like Landlock. I want to avoid people from using these features except for debug purposes. This could be changed in the future if there is a legitimate use case of some of these features, though.
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes