[PATCH net v2 0/2] net: ixgbe: Use new flag to disable Relaxed Ordering

STALE3349d SUPERSEDED

Revision v2 of 4 in this series.

8 messages, 3 authors, 2017-08-19 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net v2 0/2] net: ixgbe: Use new flag to disable Relaxed Ordering

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-17 03:25:41

The new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING has been added
to indicate that Relaxed Ordering Attributes (RO) should not
be used for Transaction Layer Packets (TLP) targeted toward
these affected Root Port, it will clear the bit4 in the PCIe
Device Control register, so the PCIe device drivers could
query PCIe configuration space to determine if it can send
TLPs to Root Port with the Relaxed Ordering Attributes set.

The ixgbe driver could use this flag to determine if it can
send TLPs to Root Port with the Relaxed Ordering Attributes set.

v2: Simplify the original program according Alex's suggestion,
    remove the new ixgbe flag2 and only check the bit4 in the
    PCIe Device Control register. 

Ding Tianhong (2):
  Revert commit 1a8b6d76dc5b ("net:add one common config...")
  net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

 arch/Kconfig                                    |  3 --
 arch/sparc/Kconfig                              |  1 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c  | 37 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c | 32 +++++++++++----------
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net v2 1/2] Revert commit 1a8b6d76dc5b ("net:add one common config...")

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-17 03:25:39

The new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING has been added
to indicate that Relaxed Ordering Attributes (RO) should not
be used for Transaction Layer Packets (TLP) targeted toward
these affected Root Port, it will clear the bit4 in the PCIe
Device Control register, so the PCIe device drivers could
query PCIe configuration space to determine if it can send
TLPs to Root Port with the Relaxed Ordering Attributes set.

With this new flag  we don't need the config ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
to control the Relaxed Ordering Attributes for the ixgbe drivers
just like the commit 1a8b6d76dc5b ("net:add one common config...") did,
so revert this commit.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
---
 arch/Kconfig                                    | 3 ---
 arch/sparc/Kconfig                              | 1 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 21d0089..00cfc63 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig

@@ -928,9 +928,6 @@ config STRICT_MODULE_RWX
 	  and non-text memory will be made non-executable. This provides
 	  protection against certain security exploits (e.g. writing to text)
 
-config ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
-	bool
-
 config REFCOUNT_FULL
 	bool "Perform full reference count validation at the expense of speed"
 	help

diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index a4a6261..987a575 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig

@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ config SPARC
 	select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
 	select LOCKDEP_SMALL if LOCKDEP
-	select ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
 
 config SPARC32
 	def_bool !64BIT

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
index 4e35e70..d4933d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c

@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_start_hw_gen2(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
 	}
 	IXGBE_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
 	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
 	for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
 		u32 regval;

-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-17 03:25:42

The ixgbe driver use the compile check to determine if it can
send TLPs to Root Port with the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set,
this is too inconvenient, now the new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING
has been added to the kernel and we could check the bit4 in the PCIe
Device Control register to determine whether we should use the Relaxed
Ordering Attributes or not, so use this new way in the ixgbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c  | 37 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c | 32 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c
index 523f9d0..d1571e3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c

@@ -175,31 +175,30 @@ static s32 ixgbe_init_phy_ops_82598(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
  **/
 static s32 ixgbe_start_hw_82598(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
 {
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	u32 regval;
-	u32 i;
-#endif
+	u32 regval, i;
 	s32 ret_val;
+	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
 
 	ret_val = ixgbe_start_hw_generic(hw);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
-	}
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {
+		/* Disable relaxed ordering */
+		for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
+		     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
+			regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
+			regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
+			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
+		}
 
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
-			    IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
+		for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues) &&
+		     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
+			regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
+			regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
+				    IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
+			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
+		}
 	}
-#endif
+
 	if (ret_val)
 		return ret_val;

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
index d4933d2..d1052ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c

@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_start_hw_generic(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
 s32 ixgbe_start_hw_gen2(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
 {
 	u32 i;
+	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
 
 	/* Clear the rate limiters */
 	for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {

@@ -350,25 +351,26 @@ s32 ixgbe_start_hw_gen2(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
 	}
 	IXGBE_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
-		u32 regval;
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {
+		/* Disable relaxed ordering */
+		for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
+			u32 regval;
 
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i), regval);
-	}
+			regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i));
+			regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
+			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i), regval);
+		}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues; i++) {
-		u32 regval;
+		for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues; i++) {
+			u32 regval;
 
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
-			    IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
+			regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
+			regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
+				    IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
+			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
+		}
 	}
-#endif
+
 	return 0;
 }

-- 
1.8.3.1

RE: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Tantilov, Emil S <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-17 14:18:06

quoted hunk

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ding Tianhong
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 8:25 PM
To: davem@davemloft.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T <redacted>;
keescook@chromium.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org;
alexander.duyck@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linuxarm@huawei.com
Cc: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

The ixgbe driver use the compile check to determine if it can
send TLPs to Root Port with the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set,
this is too inconvenient, now the new flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING
has been added to the kernel and we could check the bit4 in the PCIe
Device Control register to determine whether we should use the Relaxed
Ordering Attributes or not, so use this new way in the ixgbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c  | 37 ++++++++++++---------
----
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c | 32 +++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c

b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c
index 523f9d0..d1571e3 100644

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c

@@ -175,31 +175,30 @@ static s32 ixgbe_init_phy_ops_82598(struct ixgbe_hw

*hw)
 **/
static s32 ixgbe_start_hw_82598(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	u32 regval;
-	u32 i;
-#endif
+	u32 regval, i;
	s32 ret_val;
+	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = hw->back;

	ret_val = ixgbe_start_hw_generic(hw);

-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
-	}
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {

As Alex mentioned there is no need for this check in any form.

The HW defaults to Relaxed Ordering enabled unless it is disabled in 
the PCIe Device Control Register. So the above logic is already done by HW.

All you have to do is strip the code disabling relaxed ordering.

Thanks,
Emil

Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-18 00:42:58


On 2017/8/17 22:17, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:

quoted

	ret_val = ixgbe_start_hw_generic(hw);

-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
-	}
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {

As Alex mentioned there is no need for this check in any form.

The HW defaults to Relaxed Ordering enabled unless it is disabled in 
the PCIe Device Control Register. So the above logic is already done by HW.

All you have to do is strip the code disabling relaxed ordering.

Hi Tantilov:

I misunderstood Alex's suggestion, But I still couldn't find the logic where
the HW disable the Relaxed Ordering when the PCIe Device Control Register
disable it, can you point it out?

Thanks
Ding

Thanks,
Emil


.

RE: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Tantilov, Emil S <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-18 05:04:09

-----Original Message-----
From: Ding Tianhong [mailto:dingtianhong@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:39 PM
To: Tantilov, Emil S <redacted>; davem@davemloft.net;
Kirsher, Jeffrey T [off-list ref]; keescook@chromium.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sparclinux@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
lan@lists.osuosl.org; alexander.duyck@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag



On 2017/8/17 22:17, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:

quoted

	ret_val = ixgbe_start_hw_generic(hw);

-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
-	}
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {

As Alex mentioned there is no need for this check in any form.

The HW defaults to Relaxed Ordering enabled unless it is disabled in
the PCIe Device Control Register. So the above logic is already done by

HW.

quoted

All you have to do is strip the code disabling relaxed ordering.

Hi Tantilov:

I misunderstood Alex's suggestion, But I still couldn't find the logic
where
the HW disable the Relaxed Ordering when the PCIe Device Control Register
disable it, can you point it out?

If you look at the datasheet (82599) - the description of CTRL_EXT.RO_DIS (bit 17, 0b):

Relaxed Ordering Disable. When set to 1b, the device does not request any relaxed
ordering transactions. When this bit is cleared and the Enable Relaxed Ordering bit in
the Device Control register is set, the device requests relaxed ordering transactions per queues as configured in the DCA_RXCTRL[n] and DCA_TXCTRL[n] registers.

So if you remove the code that clears the bits in DCA_T/RXCTRL relaxed ordering should
be enabled by HW when the bus allows it.

Thanks,
Emil

Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-18 05:50:41


On 2017/8/18 13:04, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Ding Tianhong [mailto:dingtianhong@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:39 PM
To: Tantilov, Emil S <redacted>; davem@davemloft.net;
Kirsher, Jeffrey T [off-list ref]; keescook@chromium.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sparclinux@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
lan@lists.osuosl.org; alexander.duyck@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag



On 2017/8/17 22:17, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:

quoted

	ret_val = ixgbe_start_hw_generic(hw);

-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
-	/* Disable relaxed ordering */
-	for (i = 0; ((i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues) &&
-	     (i < IXGBE_DCA_MAX_QUEUES_82598)); i++) {
-		regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i));
-		regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
-		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL(i), regval);
-	}
+	if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {

As Alex mentioned there is no need for this check in any form.

The HW defaults to Relaxed Ordering enabled unless it is disabled in
the PCIe Device Control Register. So the above logic is already done by

HW.

quoted

All you have to do is strip the code disabling relaxed ordering.

Hi Tantilov:

I misunderstood Alex's suggestion, But I still couldn't find the logic
where
the HW disable the Relaxed Ordering when the PCIe Device Control Register
disable it, can you point it out?

If you look at the datasheet (82599) - the description of CTRL_EXT.RO_DIS (bit 17, 0b):

Relaxed Ordering Disable. When set to 1b, the device does not request any relaxed
ordering transactions. When this bit is cleared and the Enable Relaxed Ordering bit in
the Device Control register is set, the device requests relaxed ordering transactions per queues as configured in the DCA_RXCTRL[n] and DCA_TXCTRL[n] registers.

So if you remove the code that clears the bits in DCA_T/RXCTRL relaxed ordering should
be enabled by HW when the bus allows it.

Great, Thanks for your explanation.

Thanks,
Emil


.

Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: kbuild test robot <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-19 22:11:10

Hi Ding,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ding-Tianhong/Revert-commit-1a8b6d76dc5b-net-add-one-common-config/20170820-053530
config: i386-randconfig-x011-201734 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/net//ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c: In function 'ixgbe_start_hw_gen2':

quoted

drivers/net//ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c:354:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

     if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
   drivers/net//ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c: In function 'ixgbe_start_hw_82598':

quoted

drivers/net//ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:184:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

     if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled +354 drivers/net//ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c

   331	
   332	/**
   333	 *  ixgbe_start_hw_gen2 - Init sequence for common device family
   334	 *  @hw: pointer to hw structure
   335	 *
   336	 * Performs the init sequence common to the second generation
   337	 * of 10 GbE devices.
   338	 * Devices in the second generation:
   339	 *     82599
   340	 *     X540
   341	 **/
   342	s32 ixgbe_start_hw_gen2(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
   343	{
   344		u32 i;
   345		struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
   346	
   347		/* Clear the rate limiters */
   348		for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
   349			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RTTDQSEL, i);
   350			IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RTTBCNRC, 0);
   351		}
   352		IXGBE_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
   353	
 > 354		if (!pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(adapter->pdev)) {
   355			/* Disable relaxed ordering */
   356			for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
   357				u32 regval;
   358	
   359				regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i));
   360				regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
   361				IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i), regval);
   362			}
   363	
   364			for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues; i++) {
   365				u32 regval;
   366	
   367				regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
   368				regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
   369					    IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
   370				IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
   371			}
   372		}
   373	
   374		return 0;
   375	}
   376	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help