Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:37:21PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Jiri Pirko [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+static inline int
+tcf_exts_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts,
+             struct tcf_result *res)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
+       if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))
+               return tcf_action_exec(skb, exts->actions, exts->nr_actions,
+                                      res);
+#endif
+       return 0;
+}

While you are on it, can we get rid of this macro too?

tcf_action_exec() is only defined with CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT,
not sure if compiler is kind enough to eliminate the false branch
for us:

if (false)
   return tcf_action_exec(...); // not defined but the branch is dead

At least you can add a wrapper for tcf_action_exec() to just
return 0.

Did you see?
net: sched: remove check for number of actions in tcf_exts_exec

I will add static inline stub for tcf_action_exec in case CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
is not set.