Re: [RFC] switchdev: generate phys_port_name in the core
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-28 07:27:47
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-28 07:27:47
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:35:07 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
+enum { + NETDEV_PORT_EXTERNAL, + NETDEV_PORT_EXTERNAL_SPLIT, + NETDEV_PORT_PCI_PF,Isn't PF also EXTERNAL? Cant VF be split? What I'm getting at, shoudn't these be flags?
By external PF do you mean not connected to the current host? Yes we could make a flag like that. Right now I have picked "external" to avoid too specific names like MAC/PHY/Ethernet... There could be a MAC-to-MAC connection for instance, so no PHY involved. Should we go with NETDEV_PORT_ETH? I will make SPLIT into a flag.