Re: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: net: Update the ath9k binding for SoC devices
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Date: 2017-03-28 14:56:02
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-wireless, lkml
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:44:41 AM CEST Alban wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:11:15 +0200 Christian Lamparter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Monday, March 13, 2017 10:05:09 PM CEST Alban wrote:quoted
The current binding only cover PCI devices so extend it for SoC devices. Most SoC platforms use an MTD partition for the calibration data instead of an EEPROM. The qca,no-eeprom property was added to allow loading the EEPROM content using firmware loading. This new binding replace this hack with NVMEM cells, so we also mark the qca,no-eeprom property as deprecated in case anyone ever used it.Please don't mark "qca,no-eeprom" as deprecated then. If some devices geniously need to rely on userspace for extracting and processing the calibration data, it should be stay a optional properties.Deprecated just mean that it shouldn't be used for new devices. But as it is not used by any board, misuse the firmware loading API and firmware loader user helper are deprecated in udev, I find we could also just drop it.
But LEDE/OpenWRT rely on the firmware loading API more than ever and currently there is not a replacement for it. From what I know, Luis tried to replace it with his sysdata approach: <https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/16/204> however, this was disliked by Greg KH and Linus for the following reasons. <https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/16/995>: |So I absolutely abhor "changes for changes sake". | |If the existing code works for existing drivers, let them keep it. | |And if a new interface is truly more flexible, then it should be able |to implement the old interface with no changes, so that drivers |shouldn't need to be changed/upgraded. | |Then, drivers that actually _want_ new features, or that can take |advantage of new interfaces to actually make things *simpler*, can |choose to make those changes. But those changes should have real |advantages. |[...] your nvmem approach would need to be as universal and powerful as the "qca,no-eeprom" + userspace solutions in order to deprecate it.
quoted
For example: A device that can't do easily without "qca,no-eeprom" is the AVM FRITZ!WLAN Repeater 300E. For this device, the caldata is stored in the flash, however for whatever reason the vendor choose to "reverse" it. (like completely back to front, not byteswapped or something). So an extra "unreversing step" is required. So, it would require some sort of a special nvmem-provider-processor as an alternative.Or just handle this special eeprom format in the ath9k driver. I doubt that this case is so common that it would justify adding a whole new layer to nvmem.
Well, you'll have to deal with it in nvmem, if you want it to deprecate "qca,no-eeprom". I looked into 10-ath9k-eeprom [0] of LEDE's AR71XX target and I noticed that quite a few devices patch the MACs of the wifi. If you look at the code for the Airtight C-55 and C-60, Meraki MR18, Meraki Z1, you'll notice that each one has to add a fixed value (+1, +2, ...) to the extraced MAC-Address. So how would you replicate this, with "nvmem-cell-names = address" without some sort of nvmem-provider-processor? Also, there's another usecase of a nvmem-provider-processor. For example, one could be convert all the different types of ascii-macs (Either strings like "00:11:22:33:44:55", "00.11.22.33..." or "00112233..." ) to their binary representation. For AR71XX, this is mostly done by ath79_parse_ascii_mac: https://github.com/lede-project/source/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/dev-eth.c#L1204 and grep lists the following devices: mach-dgl-5500-a1.c, mach-dhp-1565-a1.c, mach-dir-505-a1.c, mach-dir-615-c1.c mach-dir-615-i1.c, mach-dir-825-b1.c, mach-dir-825-c1.c, mach-tew-673gru.c mach-tew-712br.c, mach-tew-732br.c, mach-tew-823dru.c I did a quick check: All of them use the extracted MACs for ath9k and/or ethernet. Note: I think Ralink/MediaTek will have the same issues.
quoted
quoted
Optional properties: +- mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory +- local-mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory [...] + +Deprecated properties: - qca,no-eeprom: Indicates that there is no physical EEPROM connected to the ath9k wireless chip (in this case the calibration / EEPROM data will be loaded from userspace using the kernel firmware loader). -- mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory -- local-mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory -It sounds like you want to deprecate mac-address and local-mac-address as well. If so you sould add this to the commit as well. From my point of view, people mostly flat-out patched the eeprom-image if they wanted to set the mac-address. However, this was an extra step, if nvmem does away with it, I'm completely fine with deprecating these properties.The produced diff is very misleading because the mac-address properties get lumped with the other new optional properties. But if you look closely it just move qca,no-eeprom to the deprecated section.
Yes ok. This is the case. Thanks, Christian [0] <https://github.com/lede-project/source/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/10-ath9k-eeprom#L85>