On 03/08/2017 02:48 PM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:

quoted

On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:

quoted

refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.

The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert
fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390.

Other than that
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <redacted>

Turns out that it is better that all these patches go through the respective maintainer trees, if present.
If I send an updated patch (with subject fixed), could you merge it through your tree?

Yes, but this would be the normal scsi tree from Martin and James.

Please include my Ack in the re-sends.

Thanks a lot,
	Johannes


-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.