Thread (15 messages) read the whole thread 15 messages, 4 authors, 2017-03-17
STALE3425d

Revision v1 of 112 in this series.

Revisions (112)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]
  5. v1 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 [diff vs current]
  7. v1 [diff vs current]
  8. v1 [diff vs current]
  9. v1 [diff vs current]
  10. v1 [diff vs current]
  11. v1 [diff vs current]
  12. v1 [diff vs current]
  13. v1 [diff vs current]
  14. v1 [diff vs current]
  15. v1 [diff vs current]
  16. v1 [diff vs current]
  17. v1 [diff vs current]
  18. v1 [diff vs current]
  19. v1 [diff vs current]
  20. v1 [diff vs current]
  21. v1 [diff vs current]
  22. v1 [diff vs current]
  23. v1 [diff vs current]
  24. v1 [diff vs current]
  25. v1 current
  26. v1 [diff vs current]
  27. v1 [diff vs current]
  28. v1 [diff vs current]
  29. v1 [diff vs current]
  30. v1 [diff vs current]
  31. v1 [diff vs current]
  32. v1 [diff vs current]
  33. v1 [diff vs current]
  34. v1 [diff vs current]
  35. v1 [diff vs current]
  36. v1 [diff vs current]
  37. v1 [diff vs current]
  38. v1 [diff vs current]
  39. v1 [diff vs current]
  40. v1 [diff vs current]
  41. v1 [diff vs current]
  42. v1 [diff vs current]
  43. v1 [diff vs current]
  44. v1 [diff vs current]
  45. v1 [diff vs current]
  46. v1 [diff vs current]
  47. v1 [diff vs current]
  48. v1 [diff vs current]
  49. v1 [diff vs current]
  50. v1 [diff vs current]
  51. v1 [diff vs current]
  52. v1 [diff vs current]
  53. v1 [diff vs current]
  54. v1 [diff vs current]
  55. v1 [diff vs current]
  56. v1 [diff vs current]
  57. v1 [diff vs current]
  58. v1 [diff vs current]
  59. v1 [diff vs current]
  60. v1 [diff vs current]
  61. v1 [diff vs current]
  62. v1 [diff vs current]
  63. v1 [diff vs current]
  64. v1 [diff vs current]
  65. v1 [diff vs current]
  66. v1 [diff vs current]
  67. v1 [diff vs current]
  68. v1 [diff vs current]
  69. v1 [diff vs current]
  70. v2 [diff vs current]
  71. v1 [diff vs current]
  72. v1 [diff vs current]
  73. v1 [diff vs current]
  74. v1 [diff vs current]
  75. v1 [diff vs current]
  76. v1 [diff vs current]
  77. v1 [diff vs current]
  78. v1 [diff vs current]
  79. v1 [diff vs current]
  80. v1 [diff vs current]
  81. v1 [diff vs current]
  82. v1 [diff vs current]
  83. v1 [diff vs current]
  84. v1 [diff vs current]
  85. v1 [diff vs current]
  86. v1 [diff vs current]
  87. v1 [diff vs current]
  88. v2 [diff vs current]
  89. v1 [diff vs current]
  90. v1 [diff vs current]
  91. v1 [diff vs current]
  92. v2 [diff vs current]
  93. v1 [diff vs current]
  94. v1 [diff vs current]
  95. v1 [diff vs current]
  96. v2 [diff vs current]
  97. v3 [diff vs current]
  98. v1 [diff vs current]
  99. v1 [diff vs current]
  100. v2 [diff vs current]
  101. v1 [diff vs current]
  102. v1 [diff vs current]
  103. v1 [diff vs current]
  104. v2 [diff vs current]
  105. v1 [diff vs current]
  106. v2 [diff vs current]
  107. v1 [diff vs current]
  108. v1 [diff vs current]
  109. v1 [diff vs current]
  110. v1 [diff vs current]
  111. v2 [diff vs current]
  112. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 06/10] netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2017-03-15 17:01:08
Also in: netfilter-devel
Subsystem: ethernet bridge, netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Nikolay Aleksandrov, Ido Schimmel, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds 

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

consider a bridge with mtu 9000, but end host sending smaller
packets to another host with mtu < 9000.

In this case, after reassembly, bridge+defrag would refragment,
and then attempt to send the reassembled packet as long as it
was below 9k.

Instead we have to cap by the largest fragment size seen.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 95087e6e8258..3c5185021c1c 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -721,18 +721,20 @@ static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
-	unsigned int mtu_reserved;
+	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
+	unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
 
 	mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
+	mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
+
+	if (nf_bridge->frag_max_size && nf_bridge->frag_max_size < mtu)
+		mtu = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
 
-	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= skb->dev->mtu) {
+	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= mtu) {
 		nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
 		return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
 	}
 
-	nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
-
 	/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
 	 * boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
 	 */
-- 
2.1.4
Other recent patches touching these files
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help