On 01/13/2017 02:37 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 01/13/2017 06:04 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
index cd91070b5467..d326fc4afad7 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -81,17 +81,23 @@ static void dsa_dst_del_ds(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
static bool dsa_port_is_valid(struct dsa_port *port)
{
- return !!port->dn;
+ return !!(port->dn || port->name);
}
Does this clash with Viviens recent change to make names optional and
have the kernel assign it?
So there were two ways to look at this, one was that could check here
that ds->pd is assigned and port->name is assigned, which means that
platform data has to provide valid port name. We can also eliminate this
check entirely because we now support NULL names just fines.
Considering that the comment above struct dsa_chip_data::port_names in
net/dsa/dsa.h is pretty clear about the port_names usage, I am tempted
to keep the code as-is since without a name, for platform data, we would
not have a way to tell if a port is disabled or not.
Does that work for you?
--
Florian