[net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-09
[net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-12
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-12
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-10
Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-09
[net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-11
Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Florian Weimer <hidden> · 2017-06-04
Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-06-04
Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited · Florian Weimer <hidden> · 2017-06-05
[net-next PATCH 3/3] net: for rate-limited ICMP replies save one atomic operation · Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: for rate-limited ICMP replies save one atomic operation · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2017-01-09
Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-09

Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-01-09 18:49:50

From: Cong Wang <redacted>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:59:34 -0800

Facepalm...

This is completely unnecessary.  Discuss facts and real issues, rather
than make emotional retorts.

Thank you.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help