Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-09 17:59:57
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:42 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no really a large struct, and allocating and free of this small 112 bytes hurts performance.The original commit fixes a warning for large stack usage, icmp_send() is deep in the call stack. Your optimization for a slow path makes no sense to me.Do you have the stack trace of this event ? Even Linus allowed vmalloc() kernel stacks, while it certainly was an heresy 10 years ago. I doubt it makes a difference trying to save 104 bytes of kernel stack.
I think you should have known this, quote from Eric Dumazet
(hopefully the same one):
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 22:22 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Strange, I posted a patch like that some days ago.
which is from: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/248051/
Facepalm...