On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Liyang Yu (于立洋1) [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Please test my patch since you can reproduce it.
Thanks cong, but Eric had said: "Really, this is not something that can be solved by using 'a different initial sequence number'"
So I don't think it's nessary to test you patch, anyway thank you very much.
That is correct, I missed the signed cast, it is similar to the jiffies test,
for the overflow case, which means no matter which value we pick,
we could drop packet as it is.